Songs vs Sound Recordings: Know the difference

Two types of copyrights routinely cause frustration and confusion for many church leaders striving to honor copyright compliance. U.S. Copyright Law allows for eight specific types of works of authorship that can be copyrighted , and two of these are frequently misunderstood. They are music (or songs) –  including any accompanying words, and sound recordings – aural reproduction of some material (music, speech or sound), which may or may not itself be copyrighted.
It’s understandable that folks struggle to separate the two. For example, when your worship team needs to make copies of “God of Wonders” as recorded by Paul Baloche for rehearsal purposes, it’s a common misconception that you just need one license to do so. In fact, the song (written by Marc Byrd and Steve Hindalong) is a music copyright and owned by a the songwriter or publisher, in this case New Spring, Meaux Mercy and Storm Boy Music. Paul Baloche’s specific arrangement, rendition and recording of the song is a sound recording copyright and it is owned by the record label, in this case, Integrity Music. The music copyright is usually owned by the songwriter or one or more publishers, and the sound recording is owned by a separate party–the artist or more often a record company. The owner of the sound recording can usually be determined by locating the P symbol on the back of the CD. Note: the owner of the sound recording is often NOT the owner of the song.
It’s very important to grasp this basic distinction between songs and sound recordings to plan for obtaining licenses and paying royalties, as it impacts a variety of types of uses, exclusive rights, licensing types and fees.
Here are some examples of products and uses that may involve clearances for the rights for the music and the sound recording:
Making of audio recordings: This involves the “reproduction rights” to mechanically reproduce the music and the sound recording. The license for the music or song is called a “mechanical license,” and it must be obtained from the owner or administrator of the song. The compulsory rate for mechanical licenses is set by the U.S. Copyright Board and is currently $.091 per song per unit manufactured and distributed for up to 5:00 minutes or $.0175 per minute for over 5:00 minutes. This rate and license applies to both physical product (CDs) or audio digital files for download, which is called a DPD mechanical license. If you are making your own original recording of the song, you only need to obtain a mechanical and/or DPD license. However, if you’re reproducing the song directly from a third party recording (lifting it or burning it), then you also need to obtain a “master use license” from the record company, and the average royalty fee for the master is $.25 per track per unit. Record labels may choose to deny the master use license, so it is important to obtain the license prior to reproducing the audio track.
Synchronizing music to audiovisual products (DVDs or download files): This involves the “reproduction rights” to synchronize the music and the sound recording to your own original audiovisual product. A synchronization license must be obtained from the song owner(s), and the rates vary from publisher to publisher with an average of $.25 per song per unit (DVD or download), with minimum fees of $40-60/song ($150-500 for secular publishers); the master sync fees are $60-100/song ($350-$500 secular labels).
Streaming music online: This involves the “performance rights” to publicly perform via the internet or by digital transmission the song and the sound recording. Like the audio recording and audiovisual product, you must obtain separate licenses for each: synchronization license from the song owner, and a synchronization master license from the record company.
Performance rights organizations (PROs) represent the song internet performance rights on behalf of songwriters and publishers; ASCAP, BMI and SESAC in the U.S. You can obtain a blanket license directly from each PRO, or the one-stop WORSHIPcast license for churches and ministries, which covers 17 million songs represented by all three PRO songs and costs about $750-900 per year. These licenses do not, however, cover the digital sound recording performance rights, which must be obtained directly from the owner of each recording, or through SoundExchange, which licenses and collects royalties for digital sound recordings for internet satellite radio (such as SIRIUS XM), internet radio, cable TV music channels and similar platforms for streaming sound recordings.

Short URL: http://www.copyrightcommunity.com/?p=739

Posted by CopyrightSolver on Sep 21 2010. Filed under Using Music. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • http://www.facebook.com/mstephens268 Matt Stephens

    This is just crazy. There needs to be one place, like CCLI, where you can go to buy a license to distribute–in any form you choose–the songs you want your people to learn. Excessive red tape is a barrier to ministry.

  • Anonymous

    Hi Matt. Thanks for the comment. It certainly is a challenge for churches to stay up with all of this stuff. That said, there has been a lot of progress with new services put out by CCLI and CCS over the past few years.

    The challenge is the sheer number of copyright owners out there that need to sign off on a blanket license that covers everything. It is hard enough to get all of the Christian publishers to all agree to one standard, and CCLI has done the community a great service by doing so for several uses.

    Getting a blanket license for the master recordings just doubles the problem, because then you have to get permission from the owner of the track AND the owner of the song. The problem then gets multiplied when you take into account the multiple versions of the same song that would need to be covered. Despite the challenge involved, CCLI has announced a rehearsal track license for later this year that should address many popular Christian recordings.

    As for the larger music industry, it is unlikely that any such blanket license is coming that would cover songs outside of the CCLI catalog. There are far too many parties involved between publishers and recording artists to get on the same page.

    IMHO, copyright owners have reason to be concerned about this. The truth is that distributing rehearsal CDs is distributing exact duplicates of the songs that are for sale on iTunes Nobody who ever receives a song on a rehearsal CD will never purchase that song legally, and that is a legitimate issue for copyright owners.

    There is currently an easy method for getting the mechanical and master tracks you need. Check out the mini-guide on CDs for Churches and Ministry here:

    http://www.copyrightsolver.com/cds

  • http://twitter.com/JonathanBryce Jonathan Bryce

    Here is an honest solution for most worship leaders who need their people to learn new songs.

    1. Require all of your volunteers to download iTunes for free.

    2. Budget for the purchase of iTunes gift cards for each of your team members.

    3. Require all of your volunteers to ‘purchase’ the music they need to learn.

    Not only will this solve the problem of having to get permissions, buy blank CD’s and duplicate them yourself; it will also allow your team to expand their daily musical palette by owning a copy for themselves, be even more supportive of the artists and record labels, and be less confusing when trying to explain to the concerned church member how this copy is legal but the one they made on the computer at home is not.

    This does not mean to not take advantage of what blanket licenses your organization already has obtained, but it does help to avoid having to wait six to eight weeks to get the permission to duplicate what we usually need ASAP anyway.

    * In the long run this method might even be cheaper considering how underused most permissions you might obtain could possibly be.

    ** Step 2 may be variable because many avid music lovers (those usually a part of our volunteer teams) will be willing to obtain a legal copy of the music they love anyway.

  • Susan Fontaine Godwin

    Many thanks Jonathan for your thoughtful and practical ideas on how to honor copyrights while providing the material necessary for rehearsals. If you need a smaller number of copies for your singers and musicians, this is often the most cost effective method. If you need to make larger numbers of copies (for a choir, etc.), then obtaining licenses may be less expensive. I agree that it makes sense to understand and utilize your blanket licenses whenever possible.

blog comments powered by Disqus
CopyrightSolver.comI want to burn legally!I want to stream legally! I want to perform legally!

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

© 2012 CopyrightCommunity. All Rights Reserved. Log in - Designed by Gabfire Themes